[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50350F2D.6030408@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 10:56:13 -0600
From: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
CC: Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
olofj@...omium.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: do not flush maps on COMM for perf report
On 8/22/12 10:29 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
> Adding the EXEC event, ditto. And I agree that while adding it we want
> to do 1/2 as pre-requisite.
maps should not be flushed on a COMM event, so that was a mistake. Given
that what new information does an EXEC event provide? Same process id. A
COMM event is generated on an exec, so the name change happens. Mappings
are dropped prior to that - and there is no unmap event. That seems to
be a missing piece. Maps are added which is handled by MMAP events.
After that why is an exec event relevant?
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists