linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] perf: do not flush maps on COMM for perf report

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAA25o9S9tn0cT7yUJ-fpO7C5chXHtF_fKehttS9BUu=eqjVing@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 11:26:56 -0700
From:	Luigi Semenzato <semenzato@...omium.org>
To:	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Cc:	David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Vasiliy Kulikov <segoon@...nwall.com>,
	Stephen Wilson <wilsons@...rt.ca>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...il.com>,
	Robert Richter <robert.richter@....com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sonnyrao@...omium.org,
	olofj@...omium.org, eranian@...gle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf: do not flush maps on COMM for perf report

There is also this (incomplete, untested) patch, which shows what it
takes to add the new record type.

https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/3/2/345

On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 11:16 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
<acme@...stprotocols.net> wrote:
> Em Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:56:13AM -0600, David Ahern escreveu:
>> On 8/22/12 10:29 AM, Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote:
>> >Adding the EXEC event, ditto. And I agree that while adding it we want
>> >to do 1/2 as pre-requisite.
>>
>> maps should not be flushed on a COMM event, so that was a mistake.
>> Given that what new information does an EXEC event provide? Same
>> process id. A COMM event is generated on an exec, so the name change
>> happens. Mappings are dropped prior to that - and there is no unmap
>> event. That seems to be a missing piece. Maps are added which is
>> handled by MMAP events. After that why is an exec event relevant?
>
> Please read the original discussion about it:
>
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/2/13/545
>
> - Arnaldo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/