linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix XIP build due to PHYS

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50352EB9.4000402@codeaurora.org>
Date:	Wed, 22 Aug 2012 12:10:49 -0700
From:	Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To:	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
CC:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: Fix XIP build due to PHYS_OFFSET definition moving

On 08/09/12 23:46, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 8/2/2012 6:23 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>> During the p2v changes, the PHYS_OFFSET #define moved into a
>> !__ASSEMBLY__ section. This causes a XIP build to fail with
>>
>>  arch/arm/kernel/head.o: In function 'stext':
>>  arch/arm/kernel/head.S:146: undefined reference to 'PHYS_OFFSET'
>>
>> Momentarily leave the #ifndef __ASSEMBLY__ section so we can
>> define PHYS_OFFSET for all compilation units.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>
>> I don't know if it's worth stable, seems that nobody has compiled XIP for
>> a year (back to 2.6.39 days?).
> Is this approach acceptable? Shall I put this in the patch tracker?
>

I'll take silence to mean "yes", so I'll put this in the patch tracker
unless someone objects.

-- 
Sent by an employee of the Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of the Code Aurora Forum.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/