[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120822213010.GA8020@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 17:30:10 -0400
From: Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
dm-devel@...hat.com, tj@...nel.org, mpatocka@...hat.com,
bharrosh@...asas.com, Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 02/13] dm: Use bioset's front_pad for
dm_rq_clone_bio_info
On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 10:03:59AM -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> Previously, dm_rq_clone_bio_info needed to be freed by the bio's
> destructor to avoid a memory leak in the blk_rq_prep_clone() error path.
> This gets rid of a memory allocation and means we can kill
> dm_rq_bio_destructor.
>
> v6: Fix comment on struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info, per Tejun
>
> Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@...gle.com>
> CC: Alasdair Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/dm.c | 39 +++++++++++----------------------------
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/dm.c b/drivers/md/dm.c
> index 0c3d6dd..5ed9779 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/dm.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm.c
> @@ -86,12 +86,17 @@ struct dm_rq_target_io {
> };
>
> /*
> - * For request-based dm.
> - * One of these is allocated per bio.
> + * For request-based dm - the bio clones we allocate are embedded in these
> + * structs.
> + *
> + * We allocate these with bio_alloc_bioset, using the front_pad parameter when
> + * the bioset is created - this means the bio has to come at the end of the
> + * struct.
> */
> struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info {
> struct bio *orig;
> struct dm_rq_target_io *tio;
> + struct bio clone;
> };
>
> union map_info *dm_get_mapinfo(struct bio *bio)
> @@ -467,16 +472,6 @@ static void free_rq_tio(struct dm_rq_target_io *tio)
> mempool_free(tio, tio->md->tio_pool);
> }
>
> -static struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info *alloc_bio_info(struct mapped_device *md)
> -{
> - return mempool_alloc(md->io_pool, GFP_ATOMIC);
> -}
> -
> -static void free_bio_info(struct dm_rq_clone_bio_info *info)
> -{
> - mempool_free(info, info->tio->md->io_pool);
> -}
> -
With this change, do you still need "_rq_bio_info_cache" slab cache? I would
think that it can be cleaned up now?
Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists