[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120822224603.GH8107@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 00:46:03 +0200
From: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
To: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 19/36] autonuma: memory follows CPU algorithm and
task/mm_autonuma stats collection
Hi Andi,
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:37:33AM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> >
> > This comment seems quite accurate to me (btw I taken it from
> > sched-numa rewrite with minor changes).
>
> I had expected it to describe the next function. If it's a strategic
> overview maybe it should be somewhere else.
Well the next function is last_nid_set, and that's where the last_nid
logic is implemented. The comment explains why last_nid statistically
provides a benefit so I thought it was an ok location, but I welcome
suggestions to move it somewhere else.
Thanks,
Andrea
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists