[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120822142735.5366c9abdee5274329e65fe3@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 14:27:35 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the tip tree
Hi Paul,
Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in
kernel/rcutree.h between commit 62ab7072476a ("rcu: Use
smp_hotplug_thread facility for RCUs per-CPU kthread") from the tip tree
and commit daa5d37ff51b ("rcu: Prevent force_quiescent_state() memory
contention") from the rcu tree.
Just context changes (I think). I fixed it up (see below) and can carry
the fix as necessary.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc kernel/rcutree.h
index 1224d4c,c2a3e7d..0000000
--- a/kernel/rcutree.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree.h
@@@ -196,6 -200,13 +200,7 @@@ struct rcu_node
/* Refused to boost: not sure why, though. */
/* This can happen due to race conditions. */
#endif /* #ifdef CONFIG_RCU_BOOST */
- struct task_struct *node_kthread_task;
- /* kthread that takes care of this rcu_node */
- /* structure, for example, awakening the */
- /* per-CPU kthreads as needed. */
- unsigned int node_kthread_status;
- /* State of node_kthread_task for tracing. */
+ raw_spinlock_t fqslock ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
} ____cacheline_internodealigned_in_smp;
/*
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists