[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1368810.q4rGz16CTW@linux-lqwf.site>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:23:55 +0200
From: Oliver Neukum <oneukum@...e.de>
To: Yann Cantin <yann.cantin@...oste.net>
Cc: linux-input@...r.kernel.org, linux-usb@...r.kernel.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, dmitry.torokhov@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC ebeam PATCH v4 2/2] input: misc: New USB eBeam input driver.
On Thursday 23 August 2012 00:11:54 Yann Cantin wrote:
> +static int ebeam_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
> +{
> + struct ebeam_device *ebeam = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> + struct input_dev *input = ebeam->input;
> + int result = 0;
> +
> + mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
> + if (input->users)
> + result = usb_submit_urb(ebeam->irq, GFP_NOIO);
> + mutex_unlock(&input->mutex);
> +
> + return result;
> +}
> +
> +static int ebeam_reset_resume(struct usb_interface *intf)
> +{
> + struct ebeam_device *ebeam = usb_get_intfdata(intf);
> + struct input_dev *input = ebeam->input;
> + int err = 0;
> +
> + /* restart IO if needed */
> + mutex_lock(&input->mutex);
> + if (input->users)
> + err = usb_submit_urb(ebeam->irq, GFP_NOIO);
> + mutex_unlock(&input->mutex);
> +
> + return err;
> +}
These functions are identical. You should unify them.
Regards
Oliver
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists