lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 11:50:22 +0200
From:	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To:	Li Haifeng <omycle@...il.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Fixup the page of buddy_higher address's calculation

On Thu 23-08-12 16:40:13, Li Haifeng wrote:
> From d7cd78f9d71a5c9ddeed02724558096f0bb4508a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Haifeng Li <omycle@...il.com>
> Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 16:27:19 +0800
> Subject: [PATCH] Fixup the page of buddy_higher address's calculation

Some general questions:
Any word about the change? Is it really that obvious? Why do you think the
current state is incorrect? How did you find out?

And more specific below:

> Signed-off-by: Haifeng Li <omycle@...il.com>
> ---
>  mm/page_alloc.c |    2 +-
>  1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index ddbc17d..5588f68 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -579,7 +579,7 @@ static inline void __free_one_page(struct page *page,
>                 combined_idx = buddy_idx & page_idx;
>                 higher_page = page + (combined_idx - page_idx);
>                 buddy_idx = __find_buddy_index(combined_idx, order + 1);
> -               higher_buddy = page + (buddy_idx - combined_idx);
> +               higher_buddy = page + (buddy_idx - page_idx);

We are finding buddy index for combined_idx so why should we use
page_idx here?

>                 if (page_is_buddy(higher_page, higher_buddy, order + 1)) {
>                         list_add_tail(&page->lru,
>                                 &zone->free_area[order].free_list[migratetype]);
> --
> 1.7.5.4

-- 
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ