[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50358D6E.20209@windriver.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:54:54 +0800
From: "tiejun.chen" <tiejun.chen@...driver.com>
To: Tabi Timur-B04825 <B04825@...escale.com>
CC: "benh@...nel.crashing.org" <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
"jason.wessel@...driver.com" <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
"linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org" <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] powerpc: Bail out of KGDB when we've been triggered
On 08/22/2012 11:07 PM, Tabi Timur-B04825 wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 22, 2012 at 5:43 AM, Tiejun Chen <tiejun.chen@...driver.com> wrote:
>
>> +int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
>> +{
>> + if (kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip))
>> + return 1;
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>
> int kgdb_skipexception(int exception, struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> return !!kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip));
> }
>
> If the caller only cares about zero vs. non-zero, you can drop the !!.
Yes, so 'return kgdb_isremovedbreak(regs->nip);' is already fine and simple.
I'll update this as v2 so thanks your comment.
Tiejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists