linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] rbtree: add __rb_change

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 14:05:01 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
cc:	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>, riel@...hat.com,
	peterz@...radead.org, daniel.santos@...ox.com, aarcange@...hat.com,
	dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/9] rbtree: add __rb_change_child() helper function


On Tuesday 2012-08-21 00:17, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
>If we have carefully made a decision to inline a function, we should
>(now) use __always_inline.
>If we have carefully made a decision to not inline a function, we
>should use noinline.
>
>If we don't care, we should omit all such markings.
>This leaves no place for "inline"?

The current use of "inline" is to shut up the compiler, otherwise gcc
would emit a warning about "function declared but not used".
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/