lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1345727326-18730-1-git-send-email-glommer@parallels.com>
Date:	Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:08:46 +0400
From:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Subject: [PATCH] fork: fix oops after fork failure

When we want to duplicate a new process, dup_task_struct() will undergo
a series of allocations. If alloc_thread_info_node() fails, we call
free_task_struct() and return.

This seems right, but it is not. free_task_struct() will not only free
the task struct from the kmem_cache, but will also call
arch_release_task_struct(). The problem is that this function is
supposed to undo whatever arch-specific work done by
arch_dup_task_struct(), that is not yet called at this point.  The
particular problem I ran accross was that in x86, we will arrive at
fpu_free() without having ever allocated it.

This code is very ancient, and according to git, it is there since the
pre-git era. But forks don't fail that often, so that made it well
hidden.

Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...hat.com>
---
 kernel/fork.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/kernel/fork.c b/kernel/fork.c
index 152d023..b397435 100644
--- a/kernel/fork.c
+++ b/kernel/fork.c
@@ -299,7 +299,7 @@ static struct task_struct *dup_task_struct(struct task_struct *orig)
 
 	ti = alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node);
 	if (!ti) {
-		free_task_struct(tsk);
+		kmem_cache_free(task_struct_cachep, tsk);
 		return NULL;
 	}
 
-- 
1.7.11.4

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ