[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120823135051.GA10973@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 09:50:51 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Attilio Rao <attilio.rao@...rix.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@...citrix.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"mingo@...hat.com" <mingo@...hat.com>,
"hpa@...or.com" <hpa@...or.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 0/5] X86/XEN: Merge
x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_start and
x86_init.paging.pagetable_setup_done setup functions and document its
semantic
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:28:29AM +0100, Attilio Rao wrote:
> On 22/08/12 15:47, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >On 22/08/12 15:19, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>On Wed, 22 Aug 2012, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Tue, Aug 21, 2012 at 11:22:03PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> >>>
> >>>>On Tue, 21 Aug 2012, Attilio Rao wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>>Differences with v1:
> >>>>>- The patch serie is re-arranged in a way that it helps reviews, following
> >>>>> a plan by Thomas Gleixner
> >>>>>- The PVOPS nomenclature is not used as it is not correct
> >>>>>- The front-end message is adjusted with feedback by Thomas Gleixner,
> >>>>> Stefano Stabellini and Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
> >>>>>
> >>>>This is much simpler to read and review. Just have a look at the
> >>>>diffstats of the two series:
> >>>>
> >>>> 6 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
> >>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>>> 5 files changed, 50 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >>>> 6 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 65 deletions(-)
> >>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>versus
> >>>>
> >>>> 6 files changed, 10 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
> >>>> 6 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
> >>>> 5 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >>>> 6 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 20 deletions(-)
> >>>> 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>>The overall result is basically the same, but it's way simpler to look
> >>>>at obvious and well done patches than checking whether a subtle copy
> >>>>and paste bug happened in 3/5 of the first version. Copy and paste is
> >>>>the #1 cause for subtle bugs. :)
> >>>>
> >>>>I'm waiting for the ack of Xen folks before taking it into tip.
Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
on all patches.
Please tell me which branch its going in so I can merge that one in my tree.
Thanks!
> >>>>
> >>>I've some extra patches that modify the new "paginig_init" in the Xen
> >>>code that I am going to propose for v3.7 - so will have some merge
> >>>conflicts. Let me figure that out and also run this set of patches
> >>>(and also the previous one .. which I think you didn't have a
> >>>chance to look since you were on vacation?) on an overnight
> >>>
> >>Which previous one ?
> >>
> >This one:
> >https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/21/369
> >
> >but I would like to repost the patch serie skipping the referral to
> >PVOPS in the commit logs, I will do so right now, so please wait for
> >another patch serie.
>
> For your convenience:
> http://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/22/450
>
> Attilio
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists