[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120823160411.GA19305@somewhere.redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 18:04:14 +0200
From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] fork: fix oops after fork failure
On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 07:36:08PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> When we want to duplicate a new process, dup_task_struct() will undergo
> a series of allocations. If alloc_thread_info_node() fails, we call
> free_task_struct() and return.
>
> This seems right, but it is not. free_task_struct() will not only free
> the task struct from the kmem_cache, but will also call
> arch_release_task_struct(). The problem is that this function is
> supposed to undo whatever arch-specific work done by
> arch_dup_task_struct(), that is not yet called at this point. The
> particular problem I ran accross was that in x86, we will arrive at
> fpu_free() without having ever allocated it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...allels.com>
> Reported-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...hat.com>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists