[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120823023612.GD24471@lizard>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 19:36:15 -0700
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, David Dajun Chen <dchen@...semi.com>,
Ashish Jangam <ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] power_supply: Remove broken mark for da9052-battery
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 04:08:18PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:
> The fix for MFD part is already merged so we can remove the broken mark
> for da9052-battery.
>
> Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>
> ---
[...]
> - depends on BROKEN
Applied, thanks a lot!
Though, I had to apply the following right after:
commit bc909f27f55ceb8f950ced5cf3a26d6b26e86ca6
Author: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
Date: Wed Aug 22 19:29:44 2012 -0700
da9052-battery: Fix da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index's return value
The patch fixes the following warnings:
CHECK drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
drivers/power/da9052-battery.c:330:15: warning: symbol 'da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index' was not declared. Should it be static?
CC drivers/power/da9052-battery.o
drivers/power/da9052-battery.c: In function 'da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index':
drivers/power/da9052-battery.c:348:1: warning: control reaches end of non-void function [-Wreturn-type]
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <anton.vorontsov@...aro.org>
diff --git a/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c b/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
index a5f6a0e..20b86ed 100644
--- a/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
+++ b/drivers/power/da9052-battery.c
@@ -327,7 +327,7 @@ static int da9052_bat_interpolate(int vbat_lower, int vbat_upper,
return tmp;
}
-unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
+static unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
{
int i;
@@ -345,6 +345,13 @@ unsigned char da9052_determine_vc_tbl_index(unsigned char adc_temp)
&& (adc_temp <= vc_tbl_ref[i]))
return i + 1;
}
+ /*
+ * For some reason authors of the driver didn't presume that we can
+ * end up here. It might be OK, but might be not, no one knows for
+ * sure. Go check your battery, is it on fire?
+ */
+ WARN_ON(1);
+ return 0;
}
static int da9052_bat_read_capacity(struct da9052_battery *bat, int *capacity)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists