[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <50359FF8.7090609@zytor.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Aug 2012 20:14:00 -0700
From: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
To: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
CC: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, mmarek@...e.cz, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
JBeulich@...e.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 74/74] lto, workaround: Mark do_futex noinline to prevent
clobbering ebp
On 08/22/2012 07:29 PM, Andi Kleen wrote:
> How about just use register arguments for the first three arguments.
> This should work for the syscalls at least (may be too risky for all
> other asm entry points)
Well, it's just an effort to convert each one in turn...
> And for syscalls with more than three generate a stub that saves on the stack
> explicitely. This could be done using the new fancy SYSCALL definition macros
> (except that arch/x86 would need to start using them too in its own code)
I don't think there is any point. Just push the six potential arguments
to the stack and be done with it.
> Or is there some subtle reason with syscall restart and updated args
> that prevents it?
>
> Perhaps newer gcc can do regparm(X), X > 3 too, may be worth trying.
No, there is no such ABI defined.
> Don't have time to look into this currently though.
Always the problem.
-hpa
--
H. Peter Anvin, Intel Open Source Technology Center
I work for Intel. I don't speak on their behalf.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists