[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5036AA38.6010400@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 17:10:00 -0500
From: Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>
CC: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] revert changes to zcache_do_preload()
On 08/23/2012 03:56 PM, Minchan Kim wrote:
> Hi Seth,
>
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:33:09AM -0500, Seth Jennings wrote:
>> This patchset fixes a regression in 3.6 by reverting two dependent
>> commits that made changes to zcache_do_preload().
>>
>> The commits undermine an assumption made by tmem_put() in
>> the cleancache path that preemption is disabled. This change
>> introduces a race condition that can result in the wrong page
>> being returned by tmem_get(), causing assorted errors (segfaults,
>> apparent file corruption, etc) in userspace.
>>
>> The corruption was discussed in this thread:
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2012/8/17/494
>
> I think changelog isn't enough to explain what's the race.
> Could you write it down in detail?
I didn't come upon this solution via code inspection, but
rather through discovering that the issue didn't exist in
v3.5 and just looking at the changes since then.
> And you should Cc'ed Xiao who is author of reverted patch.
Thanks for adding Xiao. I meant to do this. For some reason
I thought that you submitted that patchset :-/
My bad.
Seth
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists