| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 01:14:10 +0200 From: Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch> To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk>, intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] i915: use alloc_ordered_workqueue() instead of explicit UNBOUND w/ max_active = 1 On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:22:27PM -0700, Tejun Heo wrote: > Hello, > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 10:43:25AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 08:56:37AM +0100, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > On Wed, 22 Aug 2012 16:40:57 -0700, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote: > > > > This is an equivalent conversion and will ease scheduled removal of > > > > WQ_NON_REENTRANT. > > > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> > > > Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@...is-wilson.co.uk> > > > > Acked-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch> for merging through any > > tree that pleases you (if it makes merging easier for WQ_NON_REENTRANT > > removal). Or should I just merge this through drm-intel-next? > > I think it would be better to route this one through drm-intel-next. > WQ_NON_REENTRANT won't be deprecated until after the next -rc1 anyway. Queued for -next, thanks for the patch. -Daniel -- Daniel Vetter Mail: daniel@...ll.ch Mobile: +41 (0)79 365 57 48 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists