[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPM=9twyQ_dFERy5DsBD60o1MZh=kZxpsgPV8J_zDWOo_Uj3bg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 17:12:34 +1000
From: Dave Airlie <airlied@...il.com>
To: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the drm tree with Linus' tree
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 5:13 PM, Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com> wrote:
> On Fri, 24 Aug 2012, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>> Hi Dave,
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the drm tree got a conflict in
>> drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_modes.c between commit 4eab81366465
>> ("drm/i915: extract connector update from intel_ddc_get_modes() for
>> reuse") from Linus' tree and commit 451023dc32d4 ("drm: remove the
>> raw_edid field from struct drm_display_info") from the drm tree.
>
> Ugh, both from me, sorry about that. Wasn't sure when or in what order
> they'd go in.
>
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary.
>
> I'm not quite sure what the patch below is against, but just removing
> the reference to raw_edid from a slightly different place is the way to
> go. Like you seem to do, so:
>
> Acked-by: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...el.com>
>
> I can also provide a patch against drm-next if needed.
That applied fine, I pulled it in for tomorrow -next.
Dave.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists