[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345809271.2848.294.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:54:31 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Jiri Slaby <jslaby@...e.cz>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, jirislaby@...il.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: remove __DATE__ and __TIME__
On Thu, 2012-08-09 at 19:43 +0200, Jiri Slaby wrote:
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/super.c b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> index e354832..67af316 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/super.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/super.c
> @@ -1431,7 +1431,6 @@ static int mount_ubifs(struct ubifs_info *c)
> ubifs_msg("reserved for root: %llu bytes (%llu KiB)",
> c->report_rp_size, c->report_rp_size >> 10);
>
> - dbg_msg("compiled on: " __DATE__ " at " __TIME__);
> dbg_msg("min. I/O unit size: %d bytes", c->min_io_size);
> dbg_msg("max. write size: %d bytes", c->max_write_size);
> dbg_msg("LEB size: %d bytes (%d KiB)",
Pushed to linux-ubifs.git, thanks! Does it make sense to hurry up and
send this to 3.6? Or it can be merged to 3.7 normally?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists