[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120824141610.GG31998@S2101-09.ap.freescale.net>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:16:13 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Richard Zhao <richard.zhao@...escale.com>,
Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>, kernel@...gutronix.de
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Add device tree support for on-chip SRAM
On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 11:17:41AM +0200, Philipp Zabel wrote:
> These patches add support to configure the on-chip SRAM via device-tree
> node and to obtain the resulting genalloc pool from a phandle pointing
> at the node.
> This allows drivers to allocate SRAM with the genalloc API without
> hard-coding the genalloc pool address.
>
It looks like a good stuff. But in the end, there is nothing IMX
specific with iram_alloc.c. Why do we name it in IMX?
Regards,
Shawn
> regards
> Philipp
>
> ---
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53.dtsi | 5 ++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/imx6q.dtsi | 5 ++
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/include/mach/iram.h | 41 -----------------
> arch/arm/plat-mxc/iram_alloc.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++++-------------
> include/linux/genalloc.h | 14 ++++++
> lib/genalloc.c | 77 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 6 files changed, 150 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists