linux-kernel - [PATCH 1/2] mm/mmu_notifier: init notifier if necessary

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <1345819025-12445-1-git-send-email-liwanp@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 22:37:04 +0800
From:	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To:	linux-mm@...ck.org
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] mm/mmu_notifier: init notifier if necessary

From: Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

While registering MMU notifier, new instance of MMU notifier_mm will
be allocated and later free'd if currrent mm_struct's MMU notifier_mm
has been initialized. That cause some overhead. The patch tries to
eleminate that.

Signed-off-by: Gavin Shan <shangw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Wanpeng Li <liwanp@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
 mm/mmu_notifier.c |   22 +++++++++++-----------
 1 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)

diff --git a/mm/mmu_notifier.c b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
index 862b608..fb4067f 100644
--- a/mm/mmu_notifier.c
+++ b/mm/mmu_notifier.c
@@ -192,22 +192,23 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
 
-	ret = -ENOMEM;
-	mmu_notifier_mm = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmu_notifier_mm), GFP_KERNEL);
-	if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm))
-		goto out;
-
 	if (take_mmap_sem)
 		down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
 	ret = mm_take_all_locks(mm);
 	if (unlikely(ret))
-		goto out_cleanup;
+		goto out;
 
 	if (!mm_has_notifiers(mm)) {
+		mmu_notifier_mm = kmalloc(sizeof(struct mmu_notifier_mm),
+					GFP_ATOMIC);
+		if (unlikely(!mmu_notifier_mm)) {
+			ret = -ENOMEM;
+			goto out_of_mem;
+		}
 		INIT_HLIST_HEAD(&mmu_notifier_mm->list);
 		spin_lock_init(&mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
+
 		mm->mmu_notifier_mm = mmu_notifier_mm;
-		mmu_notifier_mm = NULL;
 	}
 	atomic_inc(&mm->mm_count);
 
@@ -223,13 +224,12 @@ static int do_mmu_notifier_register(struct mmu_notifier *mn,
 	hlist_add_head(&mn->hlist, &mm->mmu_notifier_mm->list);
 	spin_unlock(&mm->mmu_notifier_mm->lock);
 
+out_of_mem:
 	mm_drop_all_locks(mm);
-out_cleanup:
+out:
 	if (take_mmap_sem)
 		up_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
-	/* kfree() does nothing if mmu_notifier_mm is NULL */
-	kfree(mmu_notifier_mm);
-out:
+
 	BUG_ON(atomic_read(&mm->mm_users) <= 0);
 	return ret;
 }
-- 
1.7.7.6

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/