linux-kernel - Re: Drop support for x86-32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 10:24:16 -0600
From:	Chris Friesen <chris.friesen@...band.com>
To:	Martin Nybo Andersen <tweek@...ek.dk>
CC:	wbrana <wbrana@...il.com>,
	Bernd Petrovitsch <bernd@...rovitsch.priv.at>,
	Ondrej Zary <linux@...nbow-software.org>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Drop support for x86-32

On 08/24/2012 10:14 AM, Martin Nybo Andersen wrote:
> (And I'm still not sure why one would run 32-bit applications on a 64-bit
> architecture...)

There are several architectures (powerpc comes to mind) where 32-bit 
userspace on 64-bit kernel is the norm because it offers performance 
advantages due to the smaller pointer size if the process doesn' t need 
the larger address space.  This is the rationale behind the new x32 ABI 
for x86-64 kernels.

You might also want to run legacy apps (which can't be recompiled) on 
new hardware.

Chris

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/