linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu objects in get_partial

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <000001395978f794-7569c405-1955-4e20-ad74-6e60ee4efcdc-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Fri, 24 Aug 2012 16:31:03 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
cc:	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] slub: correct the calculation of the number of cpu
 objects in get_partial_node

On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, JoonSoo Kim wrote:

> But, when using "cpu_partial_objects", I have a coding style problem.
>
>                 if (kmem_cache_debug(s)
>                         || cpu_slab_objects + cpu_partial_objects
>                                                 > s->max_cpu_object / 2)
>
> Do you have any good idea?

Not sure what the problem is? The line wrap?

Reduce the tabs for the third line?

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/