[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20120824140229.20e6a46c.akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Fri, 24 Aug 2012 14:02:29 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Matt Porter <mporter@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rapidio/tsi721: modify mport name assignment
On Tue, 21 Aug 2012 10:23:54 -0400
Alexandre Bounine <alexandre.bounine@....com> wrote:
> Modify mport device name assignment to provide clear reference to devices
> in systems with multiple Tsi721 bridges.
>
> This patch is applicable to kernel versions starting from v3.2.
This seems to imply that you think the patch should be backported into
earlier kernels. But no reason for doing this was provided.
> --- a/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c
> +++ b/drivers/rapidio/devices/tsi721.c
> @@ -2165,7 +2165,8 @@ static int __devinit tsi721_setup_mport(struct tsi721_device *priv)
> rio_init_dbell_res(&mport->riores[RIO_DOORBELL_RESOURCE], 0, 0xffff);
> rio_init_mbox_res(&mport->riores[RIO_INB_MBOX_RESOURCE], 0, 3);
> rio_init_mbox_res(&mport->riores[RIO_OUTB_MBOX_RESOURCE], 0, 3);
> - strcpy(mport->name, "Tsi721 mport");
> + snprintf(mport->name, RIO_MAX_MPORT_NAME, "%s(%s)",
> + dev_driver_string(&pdev->dev), dev_name(&pdev->dev));
And it's a non-back-compatible change to a userspace-visible interface!
As such we'd need extraordinary justification to merge it into
*future* kernels, let alone backport it.
Please, do provide much better changelogging than this.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists