[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5036ED97.8040306@redhat.com>
Date: Thu, 23 Aug 2012 22:57:27 -0400
From: Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>
To: Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
ShuoX Liu <shuox.liu@...el.com>, mjg59@...f.ucam.org,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@....com>,
Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Deepthi Dharwar <deepthi@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 0/3] c-state governor changes
On 08/23/2012 05:54 PM, Arjan van de Ven wrote:
> On 8/23/2012 2:11 PM, Rik van Riel wrote:
>> This patch set is mostly there to kick off a discussion in time
>> for Kernel Summit. When running it on my laptop, with acpi_idle,
>> I see a promising change in powertop.
>
> be careful with acpi_idle... that will remove most of the intermediate C states the platform has,
> so the policy engine no longer has good things to chose from.
Interesting, I was not aware of that.
Another thing I did see is that the intel_idle driver selects
a target residency time around 4x larger than the exit latency
for most c-states, while acpi_idle sticks to 2x by default.
Aiming for a residency time only 2x the exit latency seems
excessively aggressive, especially for the deeper c states.
The latency issues with various KVM guests communicating with
each other have been observed on various Intel and AMD chipsets,
not unique to one vendor.
--
All rights reversed
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists