[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1345857554.4840.43.camel@deadeye.wl.decadent.org.uk>
Date: Sat, 25 Aug 2012 02:19:14 +0100
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Cc: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"3.2.x.." <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Cris <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2
On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Changes since v1:
> >
> > - Fixed preempt handling in alpha idle loop
> > - added ack from Geert
> > - fixed stable email address, sorry :-/
> >
> > This time I built tested everywhere but: h8300 (compiler internal error),
> > and mn10300, parisc, score (cross compilers not available in
> > ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/)
> >
> > For testing, you can pull from:
> >
> > git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git
> > rcu/idle-fix-v2
> >
> > Thanks.
>
> I have queued these on -rcu branch rcu/idle:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
>
> This problem has been in place since 3.3, so it is hard to argue that
> it is a regression for this merge window. I have therefore queued it
> for 3.7.
I don't follow that; I would expect any serious bug fix (serious enough
for a stable update) to be acceptable for 3.6 at this point.
If the regression occurred in 3.3, then the cc lines should be something
like:
Cc: <stable@...r.kernel.org> # 3.3+
and not the current:
Cc: 3.2.x.. <stable@...r.kernel.org>
(Note, version annotations should be on the right of the address, not in
the 'real name' position on the left.)
Ben.
--
Ben Hutchings
Experience is what causes a person to make new mistakes instead of old ones.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists