[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5039406F.9040604@orcon.net.nz>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 09:15:27 +1200
From: Michael Cree <mcree@...on.net.nz>
To: paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
CC: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chris Zankel <chris@...kel.net>,
"3.2.x.." <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen Liqin <liqin.chen@...plusct.com>,
Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@...isc-linux.org>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Parisc <linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
Hirokazu Takata <takata@...ux-m32r.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Mikael Starvik <starvik@...s.com>,
Jesper Nilsson <jesper.nilsson@...s.com>,
Cris <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>,
Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/11] rcu: Add missing RCU idle APIs on idle loop v2
On 26/08/12 04:18, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 03:16:49PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 24, 2012 at 08:50:47PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>> On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 02:19:14AM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote:
>>>> On Fri, 2012-08-24 at 14:26 -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
>>>>> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 04:58:24PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes since v1:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - Fixed preempt handling in alpha idle loop
>>>>>> - added ack from Geert
>>>>>> - fixed stable email address, sorry :-/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> This time I built tested everywhere but: h8300 (compiler internal error),
>>>>>> and mn10300, parisc, score (cross compilers not available in
>>>>>> ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/tools/crosstool/files/bin/x86_64/4.6.3/)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For testing, you can pull from:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> git://github.com/fweisbec/linux-dynticks.git
>>>>>> rcu/idle-fix-v2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have queued these on -rcu branch rcu/idle:
>>>>>
>>>>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/paulmck/linux-rcu.git
>>>>>
>>>>> This problem has been in place since 3.3, so it is hard to argue that
>>>>> it is a regression for this merge window. I have therefore queued it
>>>>> for 3.7.
>>>>
>>>> I don't follow that; I would expect any serious bug fix (serious enough
>>>> for a stable update) to be acceptable for 3.6 at this point.
>>>
>>> OK, if any of the arch maintainers wishes to submit the patch to 3.6,
>>> they are free to do so -- just let me know and I will drop the patch from
>>> my tree.
>>>
>>> That said, all this does is cause spurious warnings to be printed, so
>>> not sure it really qualifies as serious. But I am happy to leave that
>>> decision with the individual arch maintainers -- it is their arch,
>>> after all, so their decision.
>>
>> Couldn't that cause hung tasks due to long lasting synchronize_rcu() ?
>
> In theory, definitely. In practice, they haven't been running into it,
> or they would be reporting hangs.
I am hereby reporting that RCU CPU stall warnings and hung tasks are
being experienced on SMP kernels built for generic Alpha. This problem
dates back quite a few kernel releases. The discussed patches appear to
fix the problem.
A backport to the 3.2 kernel, of at least the Alpha patches, would be
very much appreciated! :-)
Cheers
Michael.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists