[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120826151054.GC7428@moon>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 19:10:54 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bfields@...ldses.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/9] procfs: Convert /proc/pid/fdinfo/ handling routines
to seq-file v2
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 04:05:20PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
>
> Applied, with a couple of changes:
> * there's no need for those games with ihold/iput - opened file pins
> its inode down just fine, TYVM.
Ah, yeah, thanks!
> * struct fd_info is pointless in that form - the last argument
> of single_open() will end up in seq_file ->private, so let's just pass
> the inode there and use m->private in ->show().
Yes. Thanks!
> I'll push that into vfs.git#master (along with the previous patch) in a few hours.
>
> O_CLOEXEC is taken care of in my tree. FWIW, I'm consolidating descriptor
> handling in general into fs/file.c (and I'm seriously tempted to rename
> that sucker to something like fs/descriptors.c or fs/fdtable.c); some of
> that stuff is already in #master. I'm probably going to move some of the
> code from your fs/proc/fd.c there as well...
OK, so I'll fetch your tree and rebase the rest of series on top then,
to continue fdinfo handling. Sounds good?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists