[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120826182126.GD3690@breakpoint.cc>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 20:21:26 +0200
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@...akpoint.cc>
To: Joerg Roedel <joerg.roedel@....com>
Cc: x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, joro@...tes.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 12/19] x86, irq: Add data structure to keep AMD specific
irq remapping information
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 03:55:58PM +0200, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h
> @@ -101,6 +101,7 @@ static inline void set_io_apic_irq_attr(struct io_apic_irq_attr *irq_attr,
> irq_attr->polarity = polarity;
> }
>
> +/* Intel specific interrupt remapping information */
> struct irq_2_iommu {
> struct intel_iommu *iommu;
> u16 irte_index;
> @@ -108,6 +109,12 @@ struct irq_2_iommu {
> u8 irte_mask;
> };
>
> +/* AMD specific interrupt remapping information */
> +struct irq_2_irte {
> + u16 devid; /* Device ID for IRTE table */
> + u16 index; /* Index into IRTE table*/
> +};
so irte_index like in iommu case would make the comment superfluous. However
the struct is already named _irte...
However, the "{Intel|AMD} specific..." is helpfull since irte and such are
present in both.
Sebastian
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists