linux-kernel - Re: Drop support for x86-32

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <50398A4D.20708@gmail.com>
Date:	Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:30:37 +1000
From:	Cruz Julian Bishop <cruzjbishop@...il.com>
To:	Henrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@....eng.br>
CC:	wbrana <wbrana@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Drop support for x86-32

On 26/08/12 12:18, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote:
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012, wbrana wrote:
>> On 8/25/12, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org> wrote:
>>> So despite my humble suggestion, you've filled up my inbox with
>>> pointless rambling. Would it be at all possible you just got the f*ck
>>> off LKML? I know it's difficult to hear this but nobody gives a shit
>>> about your ideas.
>> You can temporary unsubscribe from LKML and read archives
>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel
>> http://www.ussg.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/
>> People care because they replied to my e-mails.
> Yes, people do care.  But not necessarily in the way you imply.
>
> Are you perchance William Brana?
>
I care in the sense that Skynet will never exist if this happens.

I also think it's highly illogical and, to be frank, stupid. Not saying
that Brana is stupid, but - at this time - the theory is. Maybe in
another 15-20 years, it could be a viable thing to do
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/