[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMiH66GXKPDsF0D5OOhdkBuSH-RhBUUQhM2B6bDqe2nc25YzOA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 03:52:12 -0400
From: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
To: Shmulik Ladkani <shmulik.ladkani@...il.com>
Cc: dedekind1@...il.com, dwmw2@...radead.org,
linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] mtd: cmdlinepart: fix the wrong check condition
On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 5:31 AM, Shmulik Ladkani
<shmulik.ladkani@...il.com> wrote:
> Hi Huang, Artem,
>
> On Sat, 25 Aug 2012 16:06:50 -0400 Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com> wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c b/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c
>> index fc960a3..216d751 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c
>> +++ b/drivers/mtd/cmdlinepart.c
>> @@ -322,13 +322,16 @@ static int parse_cmdline_partitions(struct mtd_info *master,
>> struct cmdline_mtd_partition *part;
>> const char *mtd_id = master->name;
>>
>> + if (!mtd_id)
>> + return 0;
>> +
>> /* parse command line */
>> if (!cmdline_parsed)
>> mtdpart_setup_real(cmdline);
>>
>> for(part = partitions; part; part = part->next)
>> {
>> - if ((!mtd_id) || (!strcmp(part->mtd_id, mtd_id)))
>> + if (!strcmp(part->mtd_id, mtd_id))
>> {
>> for(i = 0, offset = 0; i < part->num_parts; i++)
>> {
>
> This changes the behavior of cmdling parsing, which might affect users
> expecting the old behavior.
>
> According to the remark above 'parse_cmdline_partitions':
>
> * It returns partitions for the requested mtd device, or
> * the first one in the chain if a NULL mtd_id is passed in.
>
> I think the purpose of a NULL 'mtd_id' was to support simple systems
> where there's a single driver and a single chip.
> The driver could be dumb, not specifying its 'mtd_info->name'
> (thus, a NULL mtd_id is passed).
>
> In this case, since the system is simply configured (one driver, one
> chip), 'parse_cmdline_partitions' simply disregards the "mtd-id" name
> specified in the cmdline string, allowing the user to present some
> arbitrary string there.
>
> I quite remember seeing this pattern somewhere in the past, I don't know
> if it's still used, though.
>
thanks for the detail explanation.
> Obviously if you have many drivers (and many chips) in a system, that
> won't work; the drivers must initialize 'mtd_info->name' and the user
> should present a cmdline that has explicit 'mtd-id's.
>
> So question is, would we like to prohibit NULL mtd-id?
I prefer to prohibit the NULL mtd-id. The code looks strange enough.
>
> If so, we must make sure all drivers are properly assigning their
> 'mtd_info->name', and all users correctly specifying 'mtd-id' in their
> "mtdparts" cmdline strings.
yes. I agree that all the driver should set the mtd_info->name properly.
Best Regards
Huang Shijie
>
> Regards,
> Shmulik
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists