[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120826081334.GA7428@moon>
Date: Sun, 26 Aug 2012 12:13:34 +0400
From: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@...allels.com>,
James Bottomley <jbottomley@...allels.com>,
Matthew Helsley <matt.helsley@...il.com>,
aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, bfields@...ldses.org
Subject: Re: [patch 2/9] procfs: Convert /proc/pid/fdinfo/ handling routines
to seq-file v2
On Sun, Aug 26, 2012 at 03:46:53AM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 02:43:25PM +0400, Cyrill Gorcunov wrote:
> > This patch converts /proc/pid/fdinfo/ handling routines to seq-file which
> > is needed to extend seq operations and plug in auxiliary fdinfo provides
> > from subsystems like eventfd/eventpoll/fsnotify.
> >
> > Note the proc_fd_link no longer call for proc_fd_info, simply because
> > proc_fd_info is converted to seq_fdinfo_open (which is seq-file open()
> > prototype).
>
> Actually, now that I've looked at it a bit more... You've just introduced
> an ABI change here. Look:
Crap, ineed. Thanks, Al! I'll fix it up, sorry.
...
> IMO doing that at open() time is just a headache for no good reason -
> resolving descriptor to struct file * at read() time as we do now
> is much saner. Better do that in your ->show(), since you are using
> a single-shot iterator anyway...
Oh, thanks for the hint, Al! I'll rework and send an updated version.
Cyrill
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists