linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] max8907: fix use of possibly NULL idata

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120827182217.GY4339@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Mon, 27 Aug 2012 11:22:18 -0700
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Cc:	Laxman Dewangan <ldewangan@...dia.com>, Liam Girdwood <lrg@...com>,
	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...il.com>,
	Gyungoh Yoo <jack.yoo@...im-ic.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] max8907: fix use of possibly NULL idata

On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 12:25:19PM -0600, Stephen Warren wrote:

> If I interpreted Mark Brown correctly, this isn't correct; all the
> regulators within the chip should always be registered, just without any
> user-supplied constraints. Assuming I didn't misinterpret Mark, can you

That's what I meant, yes.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/