[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZse9Nq1acoAujV8ojhRKxykNX0ymcr51QAoanUbDW14g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2012 16:09:46 -0700
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...ricsson.com>,
Ola LILJA2 <ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP driver
On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> But wait. These are just local statics. Surelty you can put these into
>> struct ux500_msp instead? Here it looks like these will be used for
>> all ports, so MSP2 will enable the pins requested by MSP1 etc
>> completely broken. So put it into the struct ux500_msp state
>> container from ux500_msp_i2s.h where it belongs.
>>
>> Refer to drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c when in trouble. This
>> one is a good pinctrl example.
>
> How do you see the MSP1 and MSP3 usage protection working if I hide it
> all away in MSP specific structs?
Usage protection? Sorry not following. Please elaborate...
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists