[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <503CC904.3050207@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 28 Aug 2012 15:35:00 +0200
From: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC: rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache
when possible
On 08/28/2012 03:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> Currently if VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC is enabled we will
>> use indirect descriptors and allocate them using a simple
>> kmalloc().
>>
>> This patch adds a cache which will allow indirect buffers under
>> a configurable size to be allocated from that cache instead.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
>
> I imagine this helps performance? Any numbers?
I ran benchmarks on the original RFC, I've re-tested it now and got similar
numbers to the original ones (virtio-net using vhost-net, thresh=16):
Before:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 4512.12
After:
Recv Send Send
Socket Socket Message Elapsed
Size Size Size Time Throughput
bytes bytes bytes secs. 10^6bits/sec
87380 16384 16384 10.00 5399.18
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists