lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120829104018.GD26977@aftab.osrc.amd.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Aug 2012 12:40:18 +0200
From:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>
To:	"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...64.org>, tony.luck@...el.com,
	andi@...stfloor.org, ananth@...ibm.com, x86@...nel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...hat.com, hpa@...or.com,
	tglx@...utronix.de, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] x86/mce: Move MCE sysfs attributes out of the
 per-cpu location

On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 03:56:04PM +0530, Naveen N. Rao wrote:
> Hmmm.. Can't we just deprecate these? ;) Perhaps we can consider
> adding newer tunables in the right place.

In case you haven't noticed yet: I'm all on your side.

But let me ask you this: these attributes grow to a large number with
a large number of cores but why is this a problem? We have a bunch of
redundant attributes in sysfs, so what?

See what I mean?

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.

Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Einsteinring 24, 85609 Dornach
GM: Alberto Bozzo
Reg: Dornach, Landkreis Muenchen
HRB Nr. 43632 WEEE Registernr: 129 19551
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ