[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346250288.2586.2.camel@edumazet-glaptop>
Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 07:24:48 -0700
From: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
To: Alexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@...il.com>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
David Woodhouse <dwmw2@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] fs/proc: Move kfree outside pde_unload_lock
On Wed, 2012-08-29 at 16:50 +0300, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 29, 2012 at 7:11 AM, Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com> wrote:
> > I'll polish this patch once LKS/LPC is over...
>
> It should oops in the following way (excuse Gmail please):
> PDEO is removed from lists
> ->pde_users is 0
> PDE won't be in purge queue -- no ->release while module is alive
>
> Current code removes PDEO and checks if PDE scheduled for removal atomically.
>
> proc_reg_release remove_proc_entry
>
> de->proc_fops = NULL;
> release = pde_opener_del(inode, file);
> rcu_read_lock();
> synchronize_rcu();
> fops = rcu_dereference(pde->proc_fops);
> if (!fops) {
> rcu_read_unlock();
> ----------------------------------
> /* NOP */
> while
> (atomic_read(&de->pde_users))
> ...
> /* NOP */
>
> pde_openers_purge(de, &purge_queue);
> /* NOP */
> while
> (!list_empty(&purge_queue))
> ...
> rmmod
>
> if (release)
> release(inode, file) /* OOPS */
Fix should be trivial, proper module refcount for example.
As I said, I would do that after LKS/LPC, there is no hurry.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists