linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache when possible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <503E2F27.5060904@gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 29 Aug 2012 17:03:03 +0200
From:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	rusty@...tcorp.com.au, virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, avi@...hat.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] virtio-ring: Allocate indirect buffers from cache
 when possible

On 08/29/2012 01:07 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:35:00PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On 08/28/2012 03:20 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 03:04:03PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>> Currently if VIRTIO_RING_F_INDIRECT_DESC is enabled we will
>>>> use indirect descriptors and allocate them using a simple
>>>> kmalloc().
>>>>
>>>> This patch adds a cache which will allow indirect buffers under
>>>> a configurable size to be allocated from that cache instead.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
>>>
>>> I imagine this helps performance? Any numbers?
>>
>> I ran benchmarks on the original RFC, I've re-tested it now and got similar
>> numbers to the original ones (virtio-net using vhost-net, thresh=16):
>>
>> Before:
>> 	Recv   Send    Send
>> 	Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> 	Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> 	bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 	 87380  16384  16384    10.00    4512.12
>>
>> After:
>> 	Recv   Send    Send
>> 	Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
>> 	Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
>> 	bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec
>>
>> 	 87380  16384  16384    10.00    5399.18
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sasha
> 
> This is with both patches 1 + 2?
> Sorry could you please also test what happens if you apply
> - just patch 1
> - just patch 2
> 
> Thanks!

Sure thing!

I've also re-ran it on a IBM server type host instead of my laptop. Here are the
results:

Vanilla kernel:

MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.33.1
() port 0 AF_INET
enable_enobufs failed: getprotobyname
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

 87380  16384  16384    10.00    7922.72

Patch 1, with threshold=16:

MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.33.1
() port 0 AF_INET
enable_enobufs failed: getprotobyname
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

 87380  16384  16384    10.00    8415.07

Patch 2:

MIGRATED TCP STREAM TEST from 0.0.0.0 (0.0.0.0) port 0 AF_INET to 192.168.33.1
() port 0 AF_INET
enable_enobufs failed: getprotobyname
Recv   Send    Send
Socket Socket  Message  Elapsed
Size   Size    Size     Time     Throughput
bytes  bytes   bytes    secs.    10^6bits/sec

 87380  16384  16384    10.00    8931.05

Note that these are simple tests with netperf listening on one end and a simple
'netperf -H [host]' within the guest. If there are other tests which may be
interesting please let me know.

Thanks,
Sasha

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/