[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120830131807.GI14145@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:18:08 +0100
From: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
alsa-devel@...a-project.org, linus.walleij@...ricsson.com,
arnd@...db.de, broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com,
STEricsson_nomadik_linux@...t.st.com,
Patrice CHOTARD <patrice.chotard@...ricsson.com>,
Ola LILJA2 <ola.o.lilja@...ricsson.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 04/22] ASoC: Ux500: Move MSP pinctrl setup into the MSP
driver
On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 04:09:46PM -0700, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 20, 2012 at 4:59 AM, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org> wrote:
> > On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:51:02AM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
>
> >> But wait. These are just local statics. Surelty you can put these into
> >> struct ux500_msp instead? Here it looks like these will be used for
> >> all ports, so MSP2 will enable the pins requested by MSP1 etc
> >> completely broken. So put it into the struct ux500_msp state
> >> container from ux500_msp_i2s.h where it belongs.
> >>
> >> Refer to drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c when in trouble. This
> >> one is a good pinctrl example.
> >
> > How do you see the MSP1 and MSP3 usage protection working if I hide it
> > all away in MSP specific structs?
>
> Usage protection? Sorry not following. Please elaborate...
Don't worry about it, I think I sorted it.
Please see the lastest version of the patch (sent on 24th Aug).
--
Lee Jones
Linaro ST-Ericsson Landing Team Lead
Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: Facebook | Twitter | Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists