lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LNX.2.01.1208301808270.25988@frira.zrqbmnf.qr>
Date:	Thu, 30 Aug 2012 18:08:56 +0200 (CEST)
From:	Jan Engelhardt <jengelh@...i.de>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
cc:	Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
	Bjoern Franke <bjo@...d-west.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Which disk is ata4?

On Thursday 2012-08-30 17:22, Borislav Petkov wrote:

>On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 08:17:13AM -0700, Andy Lutomirski wrote:
>> $ dmesg |grep ST3000DM001-9YN166
>> [    1.064910] ata5.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>> [    1.064926] ata3.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>> [    1.064986] ata2.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>> [    1.065012] ata4.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>> [    1.235753] ata7.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>> [    1.727000] ata8.00: ATA-8: ST3000DM001-9YN166, CC4B, max UDMA/133
>
>Shouldn't the SATA ports have actually numbers on the motherboard. And
>if so, ata4 should be the 4th port in the nomenclature... Then it is
>only about following the cable :).

That is not reliable, especially when extra PCI cards come into play.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ