[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1346350718-30937-22-git-send-email-paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 11:18:37 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com, dipankar@...ibm.com,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/23] rcu: Reduce synchronize_rcu_expedited() latency
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
The synchronize_rcu_expedited() function disables interrupts across a
scan of all leaf rcu_node structures, which is not good for real-time
scheduling latency on large systems (hundreds or especially thousands
of CPUs). This commit therefore holds off CPU-hotplug operations using
get_online_cpus(), and removes the prior acquisiion of the ->onofflock
(which required disabling interrupts).
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/rcutree_plugin.h | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
index 7ed45c9..f1e06f6 100644
--- a/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcutree_plugin.h
@@ -800,33 +800,47 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
smp_mb(); /* Above access cannot bleed into critical section. */
/*
+ * Block CPU-hotplug operations. This means that any CPU-hotplug
+ * operation that finds an rcu_node structure with tasks in the
+ * process of being boosted will know that all tasks blocking
+ * this expedited grace period will already be in the process of
+ * being boosted. This simplifies the process of moving tasks
+ * from leaf to root rcu_node structures.
+ */
+ get_online_cpus();
+
+ /*
* Acquire lock, falling back to synchronize_rcu() if too many
* lock-acquisition failures. Of course, if someone does the
* expedited grace period for us, just leave.
*/
while (!mutex_trylock(&sync_rcu_preempt_exp_mutex)) {
+ if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap,
+ ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count))) {
+ put_online_cpus();
+ goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
+ }
if (trycount++ < 10) {
udelay(trycount * num_online_cpus());
} else {
+ put_online_cpus();
synchronize_rcu();
return;
}
- if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap, ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count)))
- goto mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
}
- if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap, ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count)))
+ if (ULONG_CMP_LT(snap, ACCESS_ONCE(sync_rcu_preempt_exp_count))) {
+ put_online_cpus();
goto unlock_mb_ret; /* Others did our work for us. */
+ }
/* force all RCU readers onto ->blkd_tasks lists. */
synchronize_sched_expedited();
- raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
-
/* Initialize ->expmask for all non-leaf rcu_node structures. */
rcu_for_each_nonleaf_node_breadth_first(rsp, rnp) {
- raw_spin_lock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs already disabled. */
+ raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&rnp->lock, flags);
rnp->expmask = rnp->qsmaskinit;
- raw_spin_unlock(&rnp->lock); /* irqs remain disabled. */
+ raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rnp->lock, flags);
}
/* Snapshot current state of ->blkd_tasks lists. */
@@ -835,7 +849,7 @@ void synchronize_rcu_expedited(void)
if (NUM_RCU_NODES > 1)
sync_rcu_preempt_exp_init(rsp, rcu_get_root(rsp));
- raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rsp->onofflock, flags);
+ put_online_cpus();
/* Wait for snapshotted ->blkd_tasks lists to drain. */
rnp = rcu_get_root(rsp);
--
1.7.8
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists