[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120830192155.GA25524@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 14:21:55 -0500
From: Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@...ei.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-security-module@...r.kernel.org,
tpmdd-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net, kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] tpm: fix tpm_acpi sparse warning on different address
spaces
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 10:45:56AM -0700, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 09:38:41AM -0500, Kent Yoder wrote:
> > acpi_os_map_memory expects its return value to be in the __iomem address
> > space. Cast it back later when used in a memcpy to avoid the same sparse
> > warning there.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Kent Yoder <key@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> I can't download linux-next right now but I don't think this is the
> correct fix. I don't think you can memcpy() directly from __iomem.
> The static checker is warning about a valid bug which should be
> addressed instead of just casted away and silenced.
I took a look at other uses of the return from acpi_os_map_memory(),
such as acpi_tb_parse_fadt(), which passes the returned pointer to
acpi_tb_create_local_fadt(), which uses ACPI_MEMCPY on it, which is just
memcpy. This code lives in drivers/acpi.
Kent
>
> regards,
> dan carpenter
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists