[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1346309023.2848.531.camel@sauron.fi.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2012 09:43:43 +0300
From: Artem Bityutskiy <dedekind1@...il.com>
To: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Cc: dwmw2@...radead.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, shmulik.ladkani@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] mtd: cmdlinepart: fix the wrong partitions number
when truncating occurs
On Sun, 2012-08-26 at 13:21 -0400, Huang Shijie wrote:
> This patch is based on the assumption that all the partitions are
> in the right offset order.
>
> Assume we have a 1GB(8Gb) nand chip, and we set the partitions
> in the command line like this:
> #gpmi-nand:100m(boot),100m(kernel),1g(rootfs)
>
> In this case, the partition truncating occurs. The current code will
> get the following result:
>
> ----------------------------------
> root@...escale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
> dev: size erasesize name
> mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
> mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
> ----------------------------------
>
> It is obvious that we lost the truncated partition `rootfs` which should
> be 824M in this case.
>
> Why? The old code sets the wrong partitions number when the truncating
> occurs. This patch fixes it. Alao add a `break` to shortcut the code in this
> case.
>
> After apply this patch, the result becomes:
> ----------------------------------
> root@...escale ~$ cat /proc/mtd
> dev: size erasesize name
> mtd0: 06400000 00040000 "boot"
> mtd1: 06400000 00040000 "kernel"
> mtd2: 33800000 00040000 "rootfs"
> ----------------------------------
>
> We get the right result.
>
> Signed-off-by: Huang Shijie <shijie8@...il.com>
Should this have CC to -stable?
--
Best Regards,
Artem Bityutskiy
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists