[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120830222843.GE3613@r65073-Latitude-D630>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 06:28:45 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
HACHIMI Samir <shachimi@...neo-embedded.com>,
thierry.reding@...onic-design.de, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Benoît Thébaudeau
<benoit.thebaudeau@...ansee.com>,
Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 9/9] pwm i.MX: add devicetree support
Shouldn't this patch be merged into #5? Also, a binding doc should
be added.
Regards,
Shawn
On Tue, Aug 28, 2012 at 01:48:24PM +0200, Sascha Hauer wrote:
> From: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
>
> Signed-off-by: Philipp Zabel <p.zabel@...gutronix.de>
> Signed-off-by: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
> ---
> drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c | 25 ++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> index 308ab51..dce2acb 100644
> --- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> +++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-imx.c
> @@ -206,9 +206,25 @@ static struct pwm_ops imx_pwm_ops = {
> .owner = THIS_MODULE,
> };
>
> +struct imx_pwm_data {
> + int (*config)(struct pwm_chip *chip,
> + struct pwm_device *pwm, int duty_ns, int period_ns);
> + void (*set_enable)(struct pwm_chip *chip, bool enable);
> +};
> +
> +static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v1 = {
> + .config = imx_pwm_config_v1,
> + .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v1,
> +};
> +
> +static struct imx_pwm_data imx_pwm_data_v2 = {
> + .config = imx_pwm_config_v2,
> + .set_enable = imx_pwm_set_enable_v2,
> +};
> +
> static const struct of_device_id imx_pwm_dt_ids[] = {
> - { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_config_v1, },
> - { .compatible = "fsl,imx27-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_config_v2, },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx1-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_data_v1, },
> + { .compatible = "fsl,imx27-pwm", .data = &imx_pwm_data_v2, },
> { /* sentinel */ }
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, imx_pwm_of_match);
> @@ -257,7 +273,9 @@ static int __devinit imx_pwm_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
>
> if (of_id) {
> - imx->config = of_id->data;
> + struct imx_pwm_data *data = of_id->data;
> + imx->config = data->config;
> + imx->set_enable = data->set_enable;
> } else {
> if (cpu_is_mx1() || cpu_is_mx21()) {
> imx->config = imx_pwm_config_v1;
> @@ -290,6 +308,7 @@ static int __devexit imx_pwm_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static struct platform_driver imx_pwm_driver = {
> .driver = {
> .name = "mxc_pwm",
> + .of_match_table = of_match_ptr(imx_pwm_dt_ids),
> },
> .probe = imx_pwm_probe,
> .remove = __devexit_p(imx_pwm_remove),
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists