[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120831190733.GP4259@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 12:07:33 -0700
From: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>,
Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>,
Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>,
Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>,
Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>,
Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 01/26] rcu: New rcu_user_enter() and
rcu_user_exit() APIs
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:05:18PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
>
> RCU currently insists that only idle tasks can enter RCU idle mode, which
> prohibits an adaptive tickless kernel (AKA nohz cpusets), which in turn
> would mean that usermode execution would always take scheduling-clock
> interrupts, even when there is only one task runnable on the CPU in
> question.
>
> This commit therefore adds rcu_user_enter() and rcu_user_exit(), which
> allow non-idle tasks to enter RCU idle mode. These are quite similar
> to rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit(), respectively, except that they
> omit the idle-task checks.
>
> [ Updated to use "user" flag rather than separate check functions. ]
>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: Alessio Igor Bogani <abogani@...nel.org>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> Cc: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
> Cc: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
> Cc: Geoff Levand <geoff@...radead.org>
> Cc: Gilad Ben Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>
> Cc: Hakan Akkan <hakanakkan@...il.com>
> Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
> Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@...com>
> Cc: Max Krasnyansky <maxk@...lcomm.com>
> Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
> Cc: Stephen Hemminger <shemminger@...tta.com>
> Cc: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
> Cc: Sven-Thorsten Dietrich <thebigcorporation@...il.com>
> Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
A few suggestions below: an optional microoptimization and some bugfixes.
With the bugfixes, and with or without the microoptimization:
Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
> --- a/kernel/rcutree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcutree.c
[...]
> -static void rcu_idle_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> +static void rcu_eqs_enter_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> + bool user)
> {
> trace_rcu_dyntick("Start", oldval, 0);
> - if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> + if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {
Microoptimization: putting the !user check first (here and in the exit
function) would allow the compiler to partially inline rcu_eqs_*_common
into the two trivial wrappers and constant-fold away the test for !user.
> +void rcu_idle_enter(void)
> +{
> + rcu_eqs_enter(0);
> +}
s/0/false/
> +void rcu_user_enter(void)
> +{
> + rcu_eqs_enter(1);
> +}
s/1/true/
> -static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> +static void rcu_eqs_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval,
> + int user)
> {
> smp_mb__before_atomic_inc(); /* Force ordering w/previous sojourn. */
> atomic_inc(&rdtp->dynticks);
> @@ -464,7 +490,7 @@ static void rcu_idle_exit_common(struct rcu_dynticks *rdtp, long long oldval)
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!(atomic_read(&rdtp->dynticks) & 0x1));
> rcu_cleanup_after_idle(smp_processor_id());
> trace_rcu_dyntick("End", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> - if (!is_idle_task(current)) {
> + if (!is_idle_task(current) && !user) {
Same micro-optimization as the enter function.
> +void rcu_idle_exit(void)
> +{
> + rcu_eqs_exit(0);
> +}
s/0/false/
> +void rcu_user_exit(void)
> +{
> + rcu_eqs_exit(1);
> +}
s/1/true/
> @@ -539,7 +586,7 @@ void rcu_irq_enter(void)
> if (oldval)
> trace_rcu_dyntick("++=", oldval, rdtp->dynticks_nesting);
> else
> - rcu_idle_exit_common(rdtp, oldval);
> + rcu_eqs_exit_common(rdtp, oldval, 1);
s/1/true/, and likewise in rcu_irq_exit.
- Josh Triplett
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists