[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120831224128.GA22073@core.coreip.homeip.net>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 15:41:28 -0700
From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
To: Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, rdunlap@...otime.net,
arve@...roid.com, kernel-team@...roid.com, john.stultz@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/tty: Folding Android's keyreset driver in
sysRQ
On Fri, Aug 31, 2012 at 11:02:27PM +0100, Alan Cox wrote:
> > > Why do we need to involve a platform device and not use, for example, a module
> > > parameter, that could be set up from userspace?
> >
> > The platform device comes from the original design and was included to
> > minimise the amount of changes in code that make use of the current
> > keyreset driver.
>
> The platform device is IMHO the right answer. In this class of devices
> the stuff is compiled in, the userspace is Android, there are no modules
> and there is no reason for it to be configurable.
It does not matter if it is built in or not, /sys/module/XXX/parameters
is still there, and while havig it in kernel is "easy" you could as
easily stuff needed data into a sysfs attribute during booting.
And we should be able to get this from DT even without the platform
device (this was the next step, wasn't it?).
Thanks.
--
Dmitry
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists