[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120831084238.GD4819@local>
Date: Fri, 31 Aug 2012 10:42:38 +0200
From: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>
To: "Worth, Kevin" <kevin.worth@...com>
Cc: "Hans J. Koch" <hjk@...sjkoch.de>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de" <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: Using uio_pdrv to create an platform device for an FPGA, mmap()
fails
On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 11:03:04PM +0000, Worth, Kevin wrote:
> >
> >> but the code seems like
> >> possibly useful sample/example code.
> >
> >That is another good argument.
>
> Perhaps this could be genericized to be a generic "Memory Map Userspace
> IO Device" that takes a base address and a length in config (since those
> are really the only things that are particular to my device/usage).
I don't see a point in making it more generic than it already is. Other
people's devices generate interrupts or have several mappings. Since these
drivers are so small, especially when using uio_pdrv, it doesn't make sense
to make it more generic.
> Could be enhanced to allow for additional maps, etc. or just serve as a
> working example. Docs could then also simply refer to this as an example
> of a device that uses the uio_pdrv driver.
Just make your driver clean and simple, then refer to it in the docs as one
possible example.
Thanks,
Hans
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists