[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5041C2D5.1040503@acm.org>
Date: Sat, 01 Sep 2012 08:09:57 +0000
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
To: dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com
CC: dillowda@...l.gov, roland@...nel.org, sean.hefty@...el.com,
hal.rosenstock@...il.com, JBottomley@...allels.com,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] Fix bugs in ib_srp patches for H.A. purposes
On 08/31/12 20:00, dongsu.park@...fitbricks.com wrote:
> This patchset aims at fixing bugs that have been discovered in our own
> SRP test environment so far. These patches are based on your patchset v4,
> "Make ib_srp better suited for H.A. purposes",(09 Aug 2012).
>
> The 5th patch, "fix an error accessing invalid memory in
> rport_dev_loss_timedout" is including your suggestion (30 Aug 2012).
>
> You can also pull the following git repo to get the patches.
>
> git://github.com/advance38/linux.git srp-ha
>
> Our test setup consists of two systems.
> Kernel 3.2.15 with SCST v4193 on the target,
> and Kernel 3.2.8 with ib_srp-ha on the initiator.
> Although I rebased the patches again onto 3.6-rc3,
> I suppose there will be no significant differences.
>
> All of the known critical issues seem to have been resolved
> according to our internal tests in the last weeks.
Thanks for the testing and the feedback. Let's hope that the ib_srp
maintainer will be able to review these patches soon. For the linux-scsi
and LKML readers: I've sent my feedback about this patch series to the
linux-rdma mailing list only.
Bart.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists