lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20120901000300.GT11771@jtriplet-mobl1>
Date:	Fri, 31 Aug 2012 17:03:00 -0700
From:	Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
	dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
	mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
	peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
	dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
	fweisbec@...il.com, sbw@....edu, patches@...aro.org,
	Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>,
	"3.2.x.." <stable@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 22/26] mn10300: Add missing RCU idle APIs on
 idle loop

On Thu, Aug 30, 2012 at 02:05:39PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> From: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> 
> In the old times, the whole idle task was considered
> as an RCU quiescent state. But as RCU became more and
> more successful overtime, some RCU read side critical
> section have been added even in the code of some
> architectures idle tasks, for tracing for example.
> 
> So nowadays, rcu_idle_enter() and rcu_idle_exit() must
> be called by the architecture to tell RCU about the part
> in the idle loop that doesn't make use of rcu read side
> critical sections, typically the part that puts the CPU
> in low power mode.
> 
> This is necessary for RCU to find the quiescent states in
> idle in order to complete grace periods.
> 
> Add this missing pair of calls in the mn10300's idle loop.
> 
> Reported-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Signed-off-by: Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
> Cc: David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
> Cc: Koichi Yasutake <yasutake.koichi@...panasonic.com>
> Cc: 3.2.x.. <stable@...r.kernel.org>
> Cc: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>

Reviewed-by: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>

>  arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c |    3 +++
>  1 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
> index 7dab0cd..e9cceba 100644
> --- a/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
> +++ b/arch/mn10300/kernel/process.c
> @@ -25,6 +25,7 @@
>  #include <linux/err.h>
>  #include <linux/fs.h>
>  #include <linux/slab.h>
> +#include <linux/rcupdate.h>
>  #include <asm/uaccess.h>
>  #include <asm/pgtable.h>
>  #include <asm/io.h>
> @@ -107,6 +108,7 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>  {
>  	/* endless idle loop with no priority at all */
>  	for (;;) {
> +		rcu_idle_enter();
>  		while (!need_resched()) {
>  			void (*idle)(void);
>  
> @@ -121,6 +123,7 @@ void cpu_idle(void)
>  			}
>  			idle();
>  		}
> +		rcu_idle_exit();
>  
>  		schedule_preempt_disabled();
>  	}
> -- 
> 1.7.8
> 
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ