linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 44/74] lto: Mark functions used by the vsyscall init code visible

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20120901172623.GO16230@one.firstfloor.org>
Date:	Sat, 1 Sep 2012 19:26:23 +0200
From:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To:	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
Cc:	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	x86@...nel.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org, JBeulich@...e.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 44/74] lto: Mark functions used by the vsyscall init code visible

On Sat, Sep 01, 2012 at 07:16:45PM +0200, Andi Kleen wrote:
> > I think that there should be a comment why the symbol needs to be
> > visible (just copy the reasoning from the changelog). Otherwise someone
> > might attempt to do a cleanup a few years later, noticing that there is
> > no assembler code calling get_random_int().
> 
> Ok. On hindsight maybe it's better to split vsyscall_64.c into two
> files, one only with the vsyscall code and another with the init code.

Or checking the code again it's already done because only the emulation
is left and that is already a separate file. I'll drop those patches.

-Andi

-- 
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/